Re: listen not schema-aware

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: Agent M <agentm(at)themactionfaction(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: listen not schema-aware
Date: 2006-04-01 01:52:12
Message-ID: 6378.1143856332@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> i.e. the LISTEN/NOTIFY argument is not the name of a relation, so it
> wouldn't make much sense to schema-qualify it.

I'm not entirely sure why we even have the grammar allowing qualified
names in these statements. It's not documented that you can do that.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-04-01 04:02:28 Re: Suggestion: Which Binary?
Previous Message Neil Conway 2006-04-01 01:42:02 Re: listen not schema-aware