> On 29 Jul 2026, at 18:25, Christophe Pettus <xof(at)thebuild(dot)com> wrote:
> There was no particular reason besides lack of ambition that reindexdb and clusterdb were not included. I've added them.
>
> Agreed with Daniel that a switch to control the new behavior makes sense (I hadn't through about the status code issue).
>
> Revised patch attached (I've kept the patch name and Subject: consistent for indexing purposes). It applies cleanly to 9fa2c1ebd17.
I've only skimmed the patch thus far, but in general this seems like a good
idea to me.
--
Daniel Gustafsson