| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Silence compiler warning about ignored return value. |
| Date: | 2008-11-21 17:07:34 |
| Message-ID: | 6373.1227287254@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> (Whatcha gonna do if you fail to write the postmaster log ... try to
>> log a complaint message?)
> Well, good question, but I'm not convinced that doing nothing is always
> the best answer.
I didn't say it was --- merely opined that we need a consistent plan
about how to handle corner cases like that if we want to try to wipe out
all the warnings of this class.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-11-21 17:21:51 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Silence compiler warning about ignored return value. |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2008-11-21 16:46:19 | pgsql: Include the platform "FAQs" into the installation instructions. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-11-21 17:09:23 | Re: How should pg_standby get over the gap of timeline? |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-11-21 16:53:22 | Re: Opening a recovering DB in for read-only access? |