Re: Proposal: new ereport option "errdetail_log"

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal: new ereport option "errdetail_log"
Date: 2008-03-24 17:12:16
Message-ID: 6364.1206378736@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> I wonder how useful it is to output process ids at all. And for that matter
> whether leaking process ids alone could be considered a security risk.

Seems overly paranoid, especially considering we've output that
information after a deadlock for many years and no one's complained.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2008-03-24 17:20:16 Re: script binaries renaming
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-03-24 17:05:14 Re: gcc 4.3 breaks ContribCheck in 8.2 and older.