Re: add function for creating/attaching hash table in DSM registry

From: Florents Tselai <florents(dot)tselai(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: add function for creating/attaching hash table in DSM registry
Date: 2025-07-13 15:08:27
Message-ID: 635A3C33-74AC-44C1-91E0-155E2D166A72@gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 2 Jul 2025, at 10:11 PM, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 02, 2025 at 12:37:37PM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>> Oops, it looks like renaming the test_dsm_registry functions wasn't a good
>> idea:
>>
>> https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=crake&dt=2025-07-02%2017%3A11%3A10
>>
>> Will fix...
>
> Seems to be fixed with commit 0c2b717.
>
> —

It ocurred to me that no one raised the point for documenting these in xfunc;
I think they should be.

I toolk the liberty of opening a new item & patch for that
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/5914/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2025-07-13 15:19:47 Re: Bug on drop extension dependencies ?
Previous Message Marcos Pegoraro 2025-07-13 14:24:36 Re: Bug on drop extension dependencies ?