| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Paul Thomas <paul(at)tmsl(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com>, Tore Halset <halset(at)pvv(dot)ntnu(dot)no>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [JDBC] ERROR: canceling query due to user request |
| Date: | 2004-09-09 16:02:14 |
| Message-ID: | 6355.1094745734@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-jdbc |
Paul Thomas <paul(at)tmsl(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> On 09/09/2004 10:41 Oliver Jowett wrote:
>> JDBC gives you no way to ensure you only call cancel() on a running query
>> (there's a race between query execution returning and the call to
>> cancel()). Calling cancel() on a statement that's not currently executing
>> should do nothing; if it ends up cancelling a future query, it's a driver
>> bug.
> Thanks for the explaination Oliver. Maybe there is a driver bug then?
IIRC there was such a bug at one time, but I thought it had been fixed.
Maybe the problem is use of an old driver?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-09-09 16:07:45 | Re: How to determine a database is intact? |
| Previous Message | David Garamond | 2004-09-09 15:33:11 | Re: Text Search vs MYSQL vs Lucene |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oliver Jowett | 2004-09-09 21:04:06 | Re: [JDBC] ERROR: canceling query due to user request |
| Previous Message | Pierre-Frédéric Caillaud | 2004-09-09 12:56:35 | Byte Sizes |