Re: Since '2001-09-09 01:46:40'::timestamp microseconds are lost when extracting epoch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Petr Fedorov <petr(dot)fedorov(at)phystech(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Since '2001-09-09 01:46:40'::timestamp microseconds are lost when extracting epoch
Date: 2021-06-06 14:37:58
Message-ID: 633566.1622990278@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> writes:
> equalfuncs.c has been using COMPARE_COERCIONFORM_FIELD() to ignore differences
> in fields of this type. Does this spot have cause to depart from the pattern?

Oversight, I think. Will fix.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-06-06 16:38:26 Re: Since '2001-09-09 01:46:40'::timestamp microseconds are lost when extracting epoch
Previous Message Noah Misch 2021-06-06 06:33:31 Re: Since '2001-09-09 01:46:40'::timestamp microseconds are lost when extracting epoch

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-06-06 15:08:27 Re: Strangeness with UNIQUE indexes and UTF-8
Previous Message Omar Kilani 2021-06-06 13:53:14 Re: Strangeness with UNIQUE indexes and UTF-8