Re: Core dump in range_table_mutator()

Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Not directly related to that change ... I think it would be easier to
> follow if the CHECKFLATCOPY() was replaced with a separate Assert()
> and FLATCOPY() (I had to go and remind myself what CHECKFLATCOPY()
> did).
> Doing that would allow CHECKFLATCOPY() to be deleted, since this is
> the only place that uses it -- every other case knows the node type is
> correct before doing a FLATCOPY().

Well, if we want to clean this up a bit rather than just doing the
minimum safe fix ... I spent some time why we were bothering with the
FLATCOPY step at all, rather than just mutating the Query* pointer.
I think the reason is to not fail if the QTW_DONT_COPY_QUERY flag is
set, but maybe we should clear that flag when recursing?

regards, tom lane