Re: plperl tests fail with latest Perl 5.36

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: plperl tests fail with latest Perl 5.36
Date: 2022-06-01 17:30:22
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 11:40 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Looks reasonable to me, but I'm hardly a Perl monk. Anybody have
>> a different opinion?

> Well, it falsifies the immediately preceding comment, but I think it's
> fine otherwise.

Duh, right, will fix.

This seems appropriate to back-patch as far as 9.2, since AFAIK there's
not currently anything that breaks plperl in the out-of-support branches.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2022-06-01 17:35:55 Re: Assorted small doc patches
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-06-01 17:06:21 Re: silence compiler warning in brin.c