Re: [Slony1-general] WAL partition overloaded--by autovacuum?

Sorry, I forgot to mention that archive_mode is "off" and commented out, and archive command is '' and commented out.

Thanks for following up!
-- Richard

On Jul 7, 2010, at 1:58, Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz> wrote:

> On 07/07/10 13:10, Richard Yen wrote:
>>
>> This leads me to believe that there was a sudden flurry of write activity that occurred, and the process that would flush WAL files to /db/data/ couldn't keep up, thereby filling up the disk. I'm wondering if anyone else out there might be able to give me some insight or comments to my assessment--is it accurate? Any input would be helpful, and I'll try to make necessary architectural changes to keep this from happening again.
>>
>
> Do you have wal archiving enabled? (if so lets see your archive_command).
>
> Cheers
>
> Mark
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance