From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | Paul Förster <paul(dot)foerster(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: configure and DocBook XML |
Date: | 2020-11-26 16:21:56 |
Message-ID: | 620466.1606407716@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> On 2020-Nov-26, Paul Förster wrote:
>> On 26. Nov, 2020, at 14:47, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
>>> My guess is that it's related to trying to obtain stylesheets from
>>> remote Internet locations that are missing locally.
>> I don't know DocBook at all, so I can't say. But it takes about the
>> same time, whether I run configure on a machine that is connected to
>> the internet or one that isn't.
> It might be timing out, then. (The docbook test takes well under a
> second for me, but that's probably because I have all stylesheets
> locally).
On machines where I don't have the stylesheets installed, it always
takes several seconds (2 or 3, I think, though I've not put a stopwatch
on it). 15 to 20 sec does seem like a lot, so it makes me wonder if
Paul's network environment is well-configured.
There's a nearby thread in which I was suggesting that we should just
not bother with this configure test [1].
regards, tom lane
[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/E2EE6B76-2D96-408A-B961-CAE47D1A86F0%40yesql.se
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2020-11-26 16:27:03 | Re: Improper use about DatumGetInt32 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-11-26 16:02:18 | Re: proposal: possibility to read dumped table's name from file |