| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Negotiating the SCRAM channel binding type |
| Date: | 2018-08-05 14:15:19 |
| Message-ID: | 61ae586b-7a17-26df-6ceb-c051045f8f29@iki.fi |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 05/08/18 17:11, I wrote:
> The only negative test there was, was to check for bogus
> scram_channel_binding option, "scram_channel_binding=not-exists". Yeah,
> it would be nice to have some, but this commit didn't really change that
> situation.
Sorry, I see now that there was indeed a test for
scram_channel_binding='', which meant "no channel binding". That was
confusing, I assumed '' was the default.
> I'm hoping that we add a libpq option to actually force channel binding
> soon. That'll make channel binding actually useful to users, but it will
> also make it easier to write tests to check that channel binding is
> actually used or not used, in the right situations.
Nevertheless, this we should do.
- Heikki
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2018-08-05 16:01:04 | Re: Negotiating the SCRAM channel binding type |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2018-08-05 14:11:59 | Re: Negotiating the SCRAM channel binding type |