Re: 8.3 pending patch queue

From: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>
Cc: "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 8.3 pending patch queue
Date: 2007-01-09 12:56:09
Message-ID: 6194.24.136.100.2.1168347369.squirrel@www.dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 04:56:12PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> > > I am open to new names.
>> >
>> > patches-8_3 ? Anything coming in after FF then goes to patches-8_4.
>>
>> The problem there is that the web site references these, so changing the
>> URL for every release is odd, plus right now both queues are for 8.3.
>
> If we're going to start having the buildfarm build patches we might want
> to hold off on changing any names since the buildfarm stuff might want
> some changes anyway...

This will not happen any time soon, AFAIK. Fixing the queue names now
makes sense. In any case, the queues are now just mailboxes. We would need
lots more infrastructure. So nothing should be predicated on what
buildfarm might do.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gurjeet Singh 2007-01-09 13:07:48 Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: Index Advisor]
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2007-01-09 12:48:52 Re: table partioning performance