Re: Solaris versus our NLS files

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>
Cc: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Solaris versus our NLS files
Date: 2025-12-10 15:18:48
Message-ID: 619008.1765379928@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

=?utf-8?Q?=C3=81lvaro?= Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> writes:
> On 2025-Dec-10, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
>> That translation commit was on the REL_12_STABLE branch, after it was
>> cut from master (after rc1, even). Looking more closely, the
>> post-branch translation updates deleted it from version 12, 13, 14, and
>> 15, but not 16 onwards, and the file is still there in master:

Hah, yeah, I failed to notice that there's a gap in which branches
have that file. But it's definitely there in master.

> Oh. Well, that's clearly a process failure, and the fix will require us
> deleting that file on all branches from 16 and up anyway, so I have no
> issues with the plan of requiring all message catalogs to be UTF-8.

Shall I just go delete those files, or is there more process that
ought to be observed here?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker 2025-12-10 15:20:27 Re: Solaris versus our NLS files
Previous Message jian he 2025-12-10 15:11:33 Re: SQL:2023 JSON simplified accessor support