Re: Unfamous 'could not read block ... in file "...": read only 0 of 8192 bytes' again

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Maxim Boguk <maxim(dot)boguk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Unfamous 'could not read block ... in file "...": read only 0 of 8192 bytes' again
Date: 2012-02-21 06:32:42
Message-ID: 6173.1329805962@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Maxim Boguk <maxim(dot)boguk(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> While I waiting for gdb/gcc on that server I had built pg_filedump on the
> development server using same postgresql version and created pg_filedump of
> the index file.
> It can be downloaded there:
> http://maximboguk.com/static/etc/agency_statistics_pkey.pg_filedump.gz

If the index key values are not private information, could we see that
with "pg_filedump -i -f" not just bare?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Maxim Boguk 2012-02-21 07:07:13 Re: Unfamous 'could not read block ... in file "...": read only 0 of 8192 bytes' again
Previous Message Maxim Boguk 2012-02-21 05:40:30 Re: Unfamous 'could not read block ... in file "...": read only 0 of 8192 bytes' again

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Maxim Boguk 2012-02-21 07:07:13 Re: Unfamous 'could not read block ... in file "...": read only 0 of 8192 bytes' again
Previous Message Maxim Boguk 2012-02-21 05:40:30 Re: Unfamous 'could not read block ... in file "...": read only 0 of 8192 bytes' again