| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Dustin Sallings <dustin(at)spy(dot)net>, David Garamond <lists(at)zara(dot)6(dot)isreserved(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: subversion vs cvs (Was: Re: linked list rewrite) |
| Date: | 2004-03-25 04:29:43 |
| Message-ID: | 6146.1080188983@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
"Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> writes:
> I would guess that better merging might be a real motivation for
> people. If a patch that takes a month to develop can still apply
> cleanly despite significant code drift in the interrem, I could see
> that as a real motivating factor.
Not here. You want me to trust some bit of code (with absolutely zero
understanding of the source text it's hacking on) to figure out how to
resolve conflicting patches? That sounds like a recipe for big-time
unhappiness.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dustin Sallings | 2004-03-25 05:25:30 | Re: subversion vs cvs (Was: Re: linked list rewrite) |
| Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2004-03-25 04:17:53 | Re: [HACKERS] unicode error and problem |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dustin Sallings | 2004-03-25 05:25:30 | Re: subversion vs cvs (Was: Re: linked list rewrite) |
| Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2004-03-25 04:17:53 | Re: [HACKERS] unicode error and problem |