Re: A change in the Debian install

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, rob stone <floriparob(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A change in the Debian install
Date: 2017-04-07 14:10:12
Message-ID: 613e4dda-231c-55c7-c1f1-8b1f37afbeb7@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 04/05/2017 09:05 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>

> (But ... these statements are based on an assumption of out-of-the-
> box Postgres behavior. I would not exactly put it past the Debian
> packagers to have decided to change this for reasons of their own,
> and their track record of telling us about such decisions is many
> miles south of abysmal. So you might look at whatever patches
> are in the Debian package to see if there's anything touching
> pgstat.c's socket-setup logic.)
>

Wow Tom, FUD much?

Let's remember that the .Deb folks are .Org members are try very hard to
create quality packages that are of production quality.

JD

> regards, tom lane
>
>

--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alban Hertroys 2017-04-07 14:58:11 Re: [ADMIN] calculating table and index size
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2017-04-07 13:57:37 Re: keeping WAL after dropping replication slots