Re: Sequence's value can be rollback after a crashed recovery.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeremy Schneider <schneider(at)ardentperf(dot)com>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Andy Fan <zhihui(dot)fan1213(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Sequence's value can be rollback after a crashed recovery.
Date: 2021-11-23 21:41:06
Message-ID: 61104.1637703666@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> I wonder though if we shouldn't try to improve the existing text.
> The phrasing "never rolled back" seems like it's too easily
> misinterpreted. Maybe rewrite the <caution> block like
> ...

A bit of polishing later, maybe like the attached.

regards, tom lane

Attachment Content-Type Size
improve-nextval-docs.patch text/x-diff 2.5 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-11-23 21:43:25 Re: pg_upgrade parallelism
Previous Message Jacob Champion 2021-11-23 21:37:34 Re: pg_upgrade parallelism