| From: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Polyphase merge is obsolete |
| Date: | 2021-03-25 13:42:35 |
| Message-ID: | 610eafb4-c1ee-5221-c874-9be766459a98@pgmasters.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/25/21 9:41 AM, David Steele wrote:
> On 1/22/21 5:19 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> On 22/10/2020 14:48, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>>> On 11/09/2017 13:37, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>>>> I planned to do some benchmarking on this patch, but apparently the
>>>> patch no longer applies. Rebase please?
>>>
>>> Here's a rebase of this. Sorry to keep you waiting :-).
>
> I am amused that the wait here was 3+ years!
>
>> Here's an updated version that fixes one bug:
>
> We're near the end of the CF and this has not really seen any review
> after a long hiatus. I'll move this to the next CF on April 30 unless I
> hear objections.
Oops, I meant March 30.
Regards,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John Naylor | 2021-03-25 13:55:57 | Re: Tying an object's ownership to datdba |
| Previous Message | David Steele | 2021-03-25 13:41:05 | Re: Polyphase merge is obsolete |