Re: Polyphase merge is obsolete

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Polyphase merge is obsolete
Date: 2021-03-25 13:41:05
Message-ID: 4a76a7b9-09b2-f52d-210e-c8f3f44c57c7@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 1/22/21 5:19 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 22/10/2020 14:48, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> On 11/09/2017 13:37, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>>> I planned to do some benchmarking on this patch, but apparently the
>>> patch no longer applies. Rebase please?
>>
>> Here's a rebase of this. Sorry to keep you waiting :-).

I am amused that the wait here was 3+ years!

> Here's an updated version that fixes one bug:

We're near the end of the CF and this has not really seen any review
after a long hiatus. I'll move this to the next CF on April 30 unless I
hear objections.

Regards,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Steele 2021-03-25 13:42:35 Re: Polyphase merge is obsolete
Previous Message Dean Rasheed 2021-03-25 13:33:34 Re: PoC/WIP: Extended statistics on expressions