From: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgbuildfarm-members(at)pgfoundry(dot)org, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [Pgbuildfarm-members] [Fwd: PGBuildfarm member narwhal Branch HEAD Status changed from OK to InstallCheck failure] |
Date: | 2007-04-26 10:47:02 |
Message-ID: | 61023.75.177.135.163.1177584422.squirrel@www.dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | buildfarm-members pgsql-hackers |
Dave Page wrote:
> This was another occurance of the strange create index failure on
> Narwhal - unfortunately, despite having 'keep_error_builds' => 1 in my
> BF config it seems to have removed the tree so I can't get the dump that
> Tom wanted.
>
> Does anyone know why the keep_error_builds option didn't work in this
> case? Or have I misinterpreted it's meaning?
>
Well, "anyone" will usually be me ;-)
To the best of my knowledge and belief it does work. This is the code it
should cause to be executed:
my $timestr = strftime "%Y-%m-%d-%H:%M:%S", localtime($now);
move("$pgsql", "pgsqlkeep.$timestr");
move("inst", "instkeep.$timestr") if (-d "inst") ;
Please see if you can trap the script stdout/stderr somewhere so that next
time it fails you can send it to me.
How exactly do you have the buildfarm runs automated? Maybe that does a
little cleaning of its own?
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2007-04-26 11:56:05 | Re: [Pgbuildfarm-members] [Fwd: PGBuildfarm member narwhal Branch HEAD Status changed from OK to InstallCheck failure] |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2007-04-26 08:30:05 | [Fwd: PGBuildfarm member narwhal Branch HEAD Status changed from OK to InstallCheck failure] |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Zoltan Boszormenyi | 2007-04-26 11:13:38 | New version of GENERATED/IDENTITY, was Re: parser dilemma |
Previous Message | Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD | 2007-04-26 10:42:41 | Re: too much WAL volume |