Re: Linux Journal 2005 awards

From: Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Linux Journal 2005 awards
Date: 2005-06-13 15:24:08
Message-ID: 60u0k21drb.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de (Tino Wildenhain) writes:

> Am Samstag, den 11.06.2005, 20:54 +0200 schrieb Michael Paesold:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have not yet seen this mentioned here, so...
>>
>> "First-round voting in the 2005 Linux Journal Readers' Choice awards is
>> underway..."
>>
>> http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/8266
>>
>> Go vote PostgreSQL!
>>
> Quite a bit loveless prepared ballot.
> Lucky they at least though of postgres there (and did
> not mistype it ;)

Actually, the way this year's awards work, there should be little
trouble with misspellings and such.

Unlike in other years, the "choices" are actually generated by
readers. This has the considerable merit that choices aren't
restricted to what someone at Linux Journal imagined were the options.

For instance, there are quite a lot of us still using MH to manage our
mail; since it's not a sexy GUI client like Evolution or KMail, it
tends to get overlooked by someone who's trying to pre-choose what's
popular. Well, for a change, MH didn't get left out :-).
--
(format nil "~S(at)~S" "cbbrowne" "acm.org")
http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/sap.html
Rules of the Evil Overlord #78. "I will not tell my Legions of Terror
"And he must be taken alive!" The command will be: ``And try to take
him alive if it is reasonably practical.''"
<http://www.eviloverlord.com/>

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brian Kilpatrick 2005-06-14 14:34:13 Re: Conventions for release numbering
Previous Message Paul Ramsey 2005-06-13 14:48:38 Re: Conventions for release numbering