Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4

From: Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4
Date: 2007-10-23 20:59:51
Message-ID: 60ejfleed4.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us (Tom Lane) writes:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> I'd suggest we have multiple checkpoints during the cycle. Checkpoint is
>> a "patch queue blitz" where we stop developing and reduce the queue to
>> nothing. Perhaps a two-week period where everybody helps reduce the
>> queue, not just Tom and Bruce. Every outstanding patch gets told what
>> they need to do in order to get it committed. FF is then just the last
>> in a series of checkpoints. Suggest we do a checkpoint every 2 months.
>
> I like this idea ...

Don't we need to have a background writer process to gradually flush
this data so that checkpoints aren't so massive? ;-)
--
let name="cbbrowne" and tld="acm.org" in String.concat "@" [name;tld];;
http://linuxfinances.info/info/oses.html
"If there are aliens, they use Lisp."
--Edward Lasker, mutatis mutandi

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2007-10-23 21:39:43 Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4
Previous Message Michael Glaesemann 2007-10-23 19:05:41 Re: Latin vs non-Latin words in text search parsing