| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jacob Champion <pchampion(at)vmware(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi" <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, "andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com" <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz" <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com" <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, "sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net" <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend |
| Date: | 2022-02-03 14:07:42 |
| Message-ID: | 60bb98da-8320-4027-672b-b70aa05469b3@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 28.01.22 15:30, Robert Haas wrote:
> I would really, really like to have an alternative to OpenSSL for PG.
What are the reasons people want that? With OpenSSL 3, the main reasons
-- license and FIPS support -- have gone away.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2022-02-03 14:10:14 | Re: libpq async duplicate error results |
| Previous Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2022-02-03 14:01:42 | Re: pg_receivewal - couple of improvements |