| From: | Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: New partitioning - some feedback |
| Date: | 2017-07-07 07:40:55 |
| Message-ID: | 609ab8e7-01c2-4b35-6824-7201b2bae434@catalyst.net.nz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 07/07/17 13:29, Amit Langote wrote:
>
> Someone complained about this awhile back [1]. And then it came up again
> [2], where Noah appeared to take a stance that partitions should be
> visible in views / output of commands that list "tables".
>
> Although I too tend to prefer not filling up the \d output space by
> listing partitions (pg_class.relispartition = true relations), there
> wasn't perhaps enough push for creating a patch for that. If some
> committer is willing to consider such a patch, I can make one.
>
Yeah, me too (clearly). However if the consensus is that all these
partition tables *must* be shown in \d output, then I'd be happy if they
were identified as such rather than just 'table' (e.g 'partition table').
regards
Mark
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | K S, Sandhya (Nokia - IN/Bangalore) | 2017-07-07 07:41:03 | Re: Postgres process invoking exit resulting in sh-QUIT core |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-07-07 07:33:45 | Re: Error while copying a large file in pg_rewind |