Re: Clustered tables improves perfs ?

From: Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Clustered tables improves perfs ?
Date: 2007-09-13 14:49:57
Message-ID: 608x7azkkq.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

pcastet(at)agematis(dot)com (Patrice Castet) writes:
> I wonder if clustering a table improves perfs somehow ?
> Any example/ideas about that ?
> ref : http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/interactive/sql-cluster.html

Sometimes.

1. It compacts the table, which may be of value, particularly if the
table is not seeing heavy UPDATE/DELETE traffic. VACUUM and VACUUM
FULL do somewhat similar things; if you are using VACUUM frequently
enough, this is not likely to have a material effect.

2. It transforms the contents of the table into some specified order,
which will improve efficiency for any queries that use that specific
ordering.
--
output = reverse("moc.enworbbc" "@" "enworbbc")
http://linuxdatabases.info/info/emacs.html
"You can swear at the keyboard and it won't be offended. It was going
to treat you badly anyway" -- Arthur Norman

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brad Nicholson 2007-09-13 15:03:22 Re: Long Running Commits - Not Checkpoints
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2007-09-13 14:29:34 Re: [Again] Postgres performance problem