Re: Sun-Oracle lovefest: PostGreNeverMind

LObermey(at)pervasive(dot)com ("Lance Obermeyer") writes:
> The free Oracle deal is limited to their high end Sparc servers,
> which (according to the article) are losing market share. It is not
> offered for their Opteron servers, which seem to be gaining share
> due to superior design. I think these are mostly different markets.
> Oracle on the proprietary architecture servers, PostgreSQL on the
> commodity architecture servers. Seems a reasonable strategy to me.

It's hard to tell exactly what's what there; doubtless the high end
SPARC hardware is losing market share; on the other hand, Sun has only
just released the "exciting new" Niagara hardware, which is exactly
the sort of "hugely-multicore" hardware that fits into what the
article is talking about.

It seems to me that if Sun falls into being an Opteron vendor, they're
dead, because that puts them into a "commodity" market competing with
HP, Celestica, IBM, and such for sales of low end hardware that they
can't get good markup on.

Where PostgreSQL fits, in that, is enormously ambiguous :-).

This certainly seems to fit into the "Let's Make A Deal" category; if
someone has an interesting deal that might sell some Sun hardware, Sun
is unlikely to cast them from the door...
--
output = reverse("moc.enworbbc" "@" "enworbbc")
http://cbbrowne.com/info/lsf.html
Rules of the Evil Overlord #154. "I will instruct my Legions of Terror
in proper search techniques. In particular, if they are searching for
escapees and someone shouts, "Quick! They went that way!", they must
first ascertain the identity of this helpful informant before dashing
off in hot pursuit." <http://www.eviloverlord.com/>