Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>
Subject: Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches
Date: 2008-05-07 14:06:17
Message-ID: 6067.1210169177@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> * It does not come close to passing the regression tests. I saw a lot of
>> ! ERROR: unrecognized node type: 903
>> which suggests that something's been screwed up about parse analysis
>> (903 = T_A_Const, which shouldn't get further than parse analysis),

> Could you tell me what queries hit these errors?

I remember seeing it on some EXECUTEs, but you really ought to run the
tests for yourself. A *minimum* requirement on any submitted patch
is that it should pass the regression tests.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2008-05-07 14:08:26 Posting to hackers and patches lists
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2008-05-07 14:00:03 Re: [PATCHES] Testing pg_terminate_backend()

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2008-05-07 14:08:26 Posting to hackers and patches lists
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2008-05-07 14:00:03 Re: [PATCHES] Testing pg_terminate_backend()