Re: TODO item: Allow more complex user/database default GUC settings

From: Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: TODO item: Allow more complex user/database default GUC settings
Date: 2009-09-23 19:03:27
Message-ID: 6063DBF0F78466053435E217@amenophis
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

--On 23. September 2009 14:10:39 -0400 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> FWIW, I looked the patch over quickly, and I think it will be fine once
> Bernd's comments are addressed. In particular I agree with the
> objection to the name "pg_setting" as being confusingly close to
> "pg_settings". But "pg_user_setting" isn't better. Maybe
> "pg_db_role_settings"?

Jepp, that's better, +1 from me.

I'm done with this, too, so i will mark this as "Returned with Feedback",
if no one objects?

--
Thanks

Bernd

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-09-23 19:26:59 Re: new version of PQconnectdb was:(Re: [HACKERS] Determining client_encoding from client locale)
Previous Message Hans-Juergen Schoenig -- PostgreSQL 2009-09-23 18:58:37 Re: SELECT ... FOR UPDATE [WAIT integer | NOWAIT] for 8.5