Re: insufficient data left in message

From: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: insufficient data left in message
Date: 2008-02-21 17:33:09
Message-ID: 60545B06-894C-4DA7-BEAD-E2377BAE1EE4@fastcrypt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

More questions....

Feb 21 10:22:52 db02a postgres[31111]: [742-1]
user=mocospace_user,db=jnj LOG: duration: 0.088 ms execute S_3:
select * from user_profile
,user_profile_access where
Feb 21 10:22:52 db02a postgres[31111]: [742-2]
user_profile.uid=user_profile_access.uid and user_profile.uid=$1 and
isactive=$2
Feb 21 10:22:52 db02a postgres[31111]: [742-3]
user=mocospace_user,db=jnj DETAIL: parameters: $1 = '1450984', $2 = 't'
Feb 21 10:22:52 db02a postgres[31111]: [743-1]
user=mocospace_user,db=jnj ERROR: insufficient data left in message
Feb 21 10:22:52 db02a postgres[31111]: [743-2]
user=mocospace_user,db=jnj STATEMENT: select * from
user_profile,user_profile_access where
Feb 21 10:22:52 db02a postgres[31111]: [743-3]
user_profile.uid=user_profile_access.uid and user_profile.uid=$1 and
isactive=$2
12:25Feb 21 10:22:52 db02a postgres[31111]: [744-1]
user=mocospace_user,db=jnj FATAL: invalid frontend message type 105

Is this all the same error, just logged twice or is this two
connections instances ?

Dave
On 21-Feb-08, at 10:39 AM, Tom Lane wrote:

> Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> writes:
>> This is a postgresql 8.2.5 backend. connected to a jdbc client.
>> 2008-02-21 06:12:30 EST [18880] 10.21.0.21 ERROR: insufficient data
>> left in message
>
> AFAIK this means that the frontend sent an invalidly-formatted
> message.
> There's some chance that the message was OK and the backend's message
> parsing code is at fault, but I'd suspect the former first.
>
>> So the question is: how to go about debugging this ?
>
> Put a sniffer on the TCP session, or change the ERROR to a PANIC
> and dig around in the core dump to see what the message was?
>
> Also it might be worth updating to the latest JDBC driver, if you're
> not on it already, just in case this is an already-fixed bug.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2008-02-21 17:34:06 Re: Including PL/PgSQL by default
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-02-21 17:27:59 Re: about date/time parser