| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: enable_joinremoval |
| Date: | 2010-03-29 19:57:41 |
| Message-ID: | 603c8f071003291257i4964b1cn4531e70a6a3e0a47@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 13:31 -0600, Alex Hunsaker wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:17, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> You're not addressing the original point. I have been asked how would
>>>> users know which tables have been removed and whether there is a way of
>>>> checking that.
>>>
>>> Uhh... they wont be in the explain output... Seems simple enough.
>
>> That is exactly what I replied, though nobody felt that was a great
>> answer.
>
> Who complained about that exactly? It seems like a perfectly
> appropriate answer to me.
Jaime Casanova.
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Anindya Jyoti Roy | 2010-03-29 20:03:59 | GSoC |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-03-29 19:55:28 | Re: enable_joinremoval |