Re: 9.0 release notes done

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 9.0 release notes done
Date: 2010-03-22 00:41:23
Message-ID: 603c8f071003211741j69a546ds327911633d37507e@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> bruce wrote:
>> Josh Berkus wrote:
>> > On 3/19/10 9:02 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> > > I have completed the 9.0 release notes:
>> > >
>> > >   http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/release-9-0.html
>> > >
>> > > I kept the 9.0-alpha release notes in the SGML because people might want
>> > > to compare them with the release notes I did, and because the
>> > > introductory text will be needed for the next alpha.  Eventually we will
>> > > want to trim the alpha SGML and perhaps place it in a large comment
>> > > block for use for 9.1 alphas.
>> >
>> > I'm going to paste these into the wiki so that I can edit them for
>> > language and style.
>>
>> I am unclear how you expect to merge this back into SGML from a wiki.
>> Also consider the SGML will be modified regularly from now on.
>
> In hindsight I could have loaded the ASCII release notes into a wiki and
> people could have modified, them, and later I could have converted them
> to SGML, though that would have delayed the release notes being ready
> for a tarball.

Yeah, I don't think that would have been better.

...Robert

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2010-03-22 01:43:53 Re: 9.0 release notes done
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-03-22 00:40:38 Re: proposal: more practical view on function's source code