Re: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Lou Picciano <loupicciano(at)comcast(dot)net>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?
Date: 2010-03-12 02:53:44
Message-ID: 603c8f071003111853m6c51c7tcdf6c4038285047d@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Robert Haas escribió:
>> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
>> > What I'd be for is breaking the docs out as a separate top-level target,
>> > ie "make docs", "make install-docs".  I don't much care for Lou's
>> > suggestion of tying it to a configure option because that imposes the
>> > significant additional cost of re-configuring when I change my mind.
>> > I do need to be *able* to build the docs, I just don't want it happening
>> > by surprise.
>>
>> Agreed.  I think that is a much better solution.
>
> +1, and I think docs should be a dependency of world, too.

Definitely.

...Robert

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bhavin 2010-03-12 05:23:47 BUG #5373: Crash at the first time system bootup
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-03-12 01:50:14 Re: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?