Re: Package namespace and Safe init cleanup for plperl [PATCH]

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tim Bunce <Tim(dot)Bunce(at)pobox(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Package namespace and Safe init cleanup for plperl [PATCH]
Date: 2010-02-13 02:14:47
Message-ID: 603c8f071002121814v3848a896x9265504b8ffd345f@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> I'm a bit inclined to commit the piece of this patch that concerns the
> warnings pragma, and leave the rest for the next release,

Based on the subsequent discussion on this thread, +1 for this
approach. Allowing use warnings sounds good; opening a potential
security hole sounds bad. Sounds like it would considerably simplify
the patch, too.

...Robert

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-02-13 02:27:09 Re: knngist patch support
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-02-13 02:12:43 Re: Writeable CTEs and empty relations