Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove old-style VACUUM FULL (which was known for a little while

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove old-style VACUUM FULL (which was known for a little while
Date: 2010-02-11 18:42:13
Message-ID: 603c8f071002111042y40971cfbod4628a2028925d67@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Avoiding a scan before running pg_upgrade is just a performance
> optimisation.

But using pg_upgrade AT ALL is also a performance optimization; in
fact AFAICS it's the only reason to use pg_upgrade. So if you take
that away there's no reason to use it at all.

...Robert

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2010-02-11 19:03:08 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove old-style VACUUM FULL (which was known for a little while
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2010-02-11 18:33:16 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove old-style VACUUM FULL (which was known for a little while

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-02-11 18:52:12 Re: [PATCH] Provide rowcount for utility SELECTs
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2010-02-11 18:33:16 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove old-style VACUUM FULL (which was known for a little while