Re: Writeable CTEs and empty relations

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Writeable CTEs and empty relations
Date: 2010-02-11 15:53:22
Message-ID: 603c8f071002110753u6be64d27u9a45399c5a711c41@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Marko Tiikkaja
<marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi> wrote:
> On 2010-02-11 03:44 +0200, I wrote:
>> I'm going to have to disappoint a bunch of people and give up. :-(
>
> Btw. would it make sense to apply the WITH-on-top-of-DML part of this
> patch?  At least to me, this seems useful because you can write a
> RECURSIVE SELECT and then use UPDATE .. FROM or DELETE .. USING on that CTE.

Hmm, that's a thought. Can you split out just that part?

...Robert

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-02-11 15:55:28 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove old-style VACUUM FULL (which was known for a little while
Previous Message Mark Mielke 2010-02-11 15:36:35 Re: Hostnames in pg_hba.conf