On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm not sure whether allowing that would be good or bad. I see no
>> obvious killer reason why it'd be bad, but it seems like the kind of
>> thing we might regret someday. pg_global is in some sense an
>> implementation artifact, so allowing users to depend on it might be
>> bad in the long run.
>
> Agreed, it feels scary to allow it.
+1.
...Robert