| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> |
| Cc: | Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Mark Cave-Ayland <mark(dot)cave-ayland(at)siriusit(dot)co(dot)uk>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [CFReview] Red-Black Tree |
| Date: | 2010-02-04 02:27:33 |
| Message-ID: | 603c8f071002031827n4001ace5j63211623c41949d9@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Feb 2010, Robert Haas wrote:
>
>>> I'll repeat my tests with current CVS HEAD.
>>
>> OK... can you post the exact queries that you are used for the
>> previous round of testing?
>
> Robert, Mark posted all queries in his post ! See
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-01/msg02927.php
Maybe we are now getting to the heart of the confusion. Mark wrote in
his email: "Unfortunately I was not really able to reproduce the RND
(teodor's) dataset, nor the random array test as the SQL used to test
the implementation was not present on the page above." The SQL for
the fixed-length tests is posted, but the SQL for the variable length
test is not - so Mark was just guessing on that one.
Or am I just totally confused?
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joe Conway | 2010-02-04 04:26:52 | Re: BUG #5304: psql using conninfo fails in connecting to the server |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-02-04 02:16:44 | Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings |