| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: commit fests (was Re: primary key error message) |
| Date: | 2010-01-22 14:45:20 |
| Message-ID: | 603c8f071001220645s3be682cdu7640f5ee55d4ba3@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2010/1/22 Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>:
> On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 09:10 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> I'm not sure whether you're stating a position that's been agreed to
>> by -core or some other group, or just expressing your own opinion, but
>> I think feature freeze should be the beginning of the last CommitFest,
>> not the end.
>
> Was is declared somewhere before commitfests began? If not, I would
> agree with Peter here: Beta is the feature freeze. IIRC it has always
> been so.
I don't know. I'm not trying to fabricate positions out of whole
cloth; I'm just saying what I thought we were doing. Obviously at
least some other people have a different understanding. We don't
really have much of this documented, to my knowledge, so there's
nothing that I can go read and say, ok, this is what the procedure is.
Which is kind of unfortunate, actually...
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2010-01-22 14:50:54 | Re: primary key error message |
| Previous Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2010-01-22 14:42:46 | Re: warn in plperl logs as... NOTICE?? |