Re: I: TODO: Allow substring/replace() to get/set bit values

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Leonardo F <m_lists(at)yahoo(dot)it>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: I: TODO: Allow substring/replace() to get/set bit values
Date: 2010-01-04 19:45:39
Message-ID: 603c8f071001041145t1e4e2c44nfae7e685327fce21@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 5:17 AM, Leonardo F <m_lists(at)yahoo(dot)it> wrote:
> Re-reading the docs it looks like the only thing missing is get/set_bit for bit string.
>
> Substring is already implemented for bit string, and I don't really know if replace is useful at all.
>
> (sorry if the other mail came with a different sender name)

You might want to search the archives (or the wiki history, or the CVS
history if it's been there since before we moved the TODO list to the
wiki) for discussion of why that item was added to the TODO in the
first place.

...Robert

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2010-01-04 19:51:03 Re: quoting psql varible as identifier
Previous Message Boszormenyi Zoltan 2010-01-04 19:42:51 Re: ECPG SQLDA support