From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> |
Cc: | Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: KNNGiST for knn-search (WIP) |
Date: | 2009-12-30 19:37:35 |
Message-ID: | 603c8f070912301137n1a97d945ua41d675e737a4c09@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> 2009/12/30 Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>:
>>> changes should be made. It does also need to be updated to CVS HEAD,
>>> as it no longer applies cleanly.
>>
>> The reason was a point_ops patch, some OIDs become duplicated. Both attached
>> patches are synced with current CVS.
>
> Thanks! I will take a look.
OK, I'm confused. First, there are two versions of the patch here, so
I'm not sure which one I'm supposed to be looking at. Second, when I
attempt to apply either one, I get:
$ patch -p0 < ~/Download/builtin_knngist-0.5
patching file src/backend/access/gist/gistget.c
patching file src/backend/access/gist/gistproc.c
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n]
...regardless of how I answer that question, it then goes on to apply
most of the rest of the patch successfully.
Help?
...Robert
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-12-30 19:55:20 | Re: Thoughts on statistics for continuously advancing columns |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2009-12-30 19:35:04 | Re: update_process_title=off and logger, wal, ... processes |