Re: KNNGiST for knn-search (WIP)

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
Cc: Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: KNNGiST for knn-search (WIP)
Date: 2009-12-30 19:37:35
Message-ID: 603c8f070912301137n1a97d945ua41d675e737a4c09@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> 2009/12/30 Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>:
>>> changes should be made.  It does also need to be updated to CVS HEAD,
>>> as it no longer applies cleanly.
>>
>> The reason was a point_ops patch, some OIDs become duplicated. Both attached
>> patches are synced with current CVS.
>
> Thanks!  I will take a look.

OK, I'm confused. First, there are two versions of the patch here, so
I'm not sure which one I'm supposed to be looking at. Second, when I
attempt to apply either one, I get:

$ patch -p0 < ~/Download/builtin_knngist-0.5
patching file src/backend/access/gist/gistget.c
patching file src/backend/access/gist/gistproc.c
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n]

...regardless of how I answer that question, it then goes on to apply
most of the rest of the patch successfully.

Help?

...Robert

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-12-30 19:55:20 Re: Thoughts on statistics for continuously advancing columns
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2009-12-30 19:35:04 Re: update_process_title=off and logger, wal, ... processes