Re: pgFoundry Download URLs

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com
Cc: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgFoundry Download URLs
Date: 2009-12-29 03:13:20
Message-ID: 603c8f070912281913h310f5643ufb0a895faaa034a7@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-12-28 at 11:42 -0800, David E. Wheeler wrote:
>> On Dec 28, 2009, at 11:23 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>
>> > The user experience is quite a bit more important than people with
>> > scripts such as Devrim's. If we are going to offer the service we should
>> > do so in a manner that is useful and productive to the consumers of that
>> > service.
>>
>> That includes scriptability, so that third parties can build services on top of it.
>
> Certainly. I am just saying that if we have 20 people it will negatively
> impact and 20,000 it will positively impact.. the 20 people need to suck
> it up.

Presumably the packages that rely on the existing URLs are actually
being used by large numbers of end-users, who will all be sad if they
break.

...Robert

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stefan Kaltenbrunner 2009-12-29 10:50:36 Re: pgFoundry Download URLs
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2009-12-28 21:03:44 Re: pgFoundry Download URLs