| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: ProcessUtility_hook |
| Date: | 2009-12-09 03:49:29 |
| Message-ID: | 603c8f070912081949w5c290d6ckc8359bcf613dd7cf@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 10:12 PM, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> It looks like the last round of issues on this patch only came from Tom's
> concerns, so I'm not sure if anyone but Tom (or a similarly picky alternate
> committer) is going to find anything else in a re-review. It looks to me
> like all the issues were sorted out anyway. Euler, you're off the hook for
> this one; it looks "ready for committer" to me.
Since Itagaki Takahiro is now a committer, I sort of assumed he would
be committing his own patches. I am not really sure what the
etiquette is in this area, but there seems to be an implication here
someone else will be committing this, which isn't necessarily my
understanding of how it works. Certainly, unless someone has a
contrary opinion, I think he can go ahead if he wishes. On the other
hand, if it's helpful, I'm more than happy to pick up this one and/or
EXPLAIN BUFFERS for final review and commit.
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-12-09 03:50:50 | Re: [PATCH] Windows x64 [repost] |
| Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2009-12-09 03:48:34 | Re: [PATCH] Windows x64 [repost] |