| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Daniel Farina <dfarina(at)truviso(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 4/4] Add tests to dblink covering use of COPY TO FUNCTION |
| Date: | 2009-11-24 14:56:28 |
| Message-ID: | 603c8f070911240656y79415a5asf86b302361ece7f0@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 9:37 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>
>
> Greg Smith wrote:
>>
>> I haven't heard anything from Andrew about ragged CVS import either. I
>> think that ultimately those features are useful, but just exceed what the
>> existing code could be hacked to handle cleanly.
>
> The patch is attached for your edification/amusement. I have backpatched it
> to 8.4 for the client that needed it, and it's working just fine. I didn't
> pursue it when it was clear that it was not going to be accepted. COPY
> returning text[] would allow us to achieve the same thing, a bit more
> verbosely, but it would be a lot more work to develop.
FWIW, I've somewhat come around to this idea. But I might be the only one.
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Emmanuel Cecchet | 2009-11-24 15:08:33 | Re: Partitioning option for COPY |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2009-11-24 14:52:07 | Re: [PATCH 4/4] Add tests to dblink covering use of COPY TO FUNCTION |