Re: Experimental patch: generating BKI revisited

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: John Naylor <jcnaylor(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Experimental patch: generating BKI revisited
Date: 2009-11-13 15:54:20
Message-ID: 603c8f070911130754m7c4621act86625c8c1c6b44c0@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 8:16 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> I had a look at this some time ago and I must admit that I find it
> pretty interesting.  The technology choices make it
> obviously impossible to merge -- not only the particular Perl modules
> used, but the mere fact that Perl is used (and that such a recent
> version is required).  But you're already aware of all this so I'm not
> going to say more.

Really? Perl is a show-stopper? That seems harsh. Perl is pretty
ubiquitous - in fact, given that we now support Windows, arguably more
so than awk.

...Robert

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-11-13 15:55:27 Re: next CommitFest
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-11-13 15:51:39 Re: CTE containing ambiguous columns