Re: Patch: create or replace language

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum" <adsmail(at)wars-nicht(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch: create or replace language
Date: 2009-10-06 14:49:46
Message-ID: 603c8f070910060749t45122a1dg1808aac159bf053e@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Maybe I'm out of line to say this, but it seems to me that we should
>> not even be looking at newly-submitted patches at this point.
>
> It would have been more work to put it in the queue to reject later
> than to reject it now ;-).  Besides, this way Andreas has a chance
> to rewrite it into something acceptable before the next CF.

Fair enough.

...Robert

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-10-06 14:58:11 Re: moving system catalogs to another tablespace
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-10-06 14:48:39 Re: Patch: create or replace language