From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Should Webinars be training events? |
Date: | 2009-09-30 21:28:37 |
Message-ID: | 603c8f070909301428r42708e03ka5202001d5b7ceef@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 14:08 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> We're getting quite a few submissions in /events for webinars for
>> various PostgreSQL-associated companies and topics. I'm just not sure,
>> as a moderator, whether:
>>
>> a) company webinars should be bounced as too corporate, or
>> b) should be regular events, or
>> c) should be training events.
>>
>> For the kind of event I'm talking about, see this description, which is
>> typical:
>>
>> ==============
>> Event: Webinar: Achieving database high availability in 15 minutes with
>> Tungsten
>> Training event: No
>> Location: City: Web-based, State: , Country: United States
>> Summary:
>>
>> Database downtime is one of the most common reasons for application
>> failures. Unfortunately, not every product billed as an HA solution
>> solves the whole problem. Tungsten clusters are packed with features
>> that address database downtime efficiently and are easy to deploy. In 15
>> minutes, in fact.
>> ==============
>>
>> I'm really honestly not sure what to do with these kinds of events.
>> Seems to me we want to list them, but where?
>
> That isn't training. I have no problem with E-Training being a training
> event but ... 15 minutes is a marketing slide.
Yep.
...Robert
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David E. Wheeler | 2009-09-30 22:57:45 | Re: Should Webinars be training events? |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2009-09-30 21:11:01 | Re: Should Webinars be training events? |