Re: [PATCH] Reworks for Access Control facilities (r2311)

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Reworks for Access Control facilities (r2311)
Date: 2009-09-29 13:41:58
Message-ID: 603c8f070909290641r62a5205ama3fbc98f98133fe0@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 6:54 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> * KaiGai Kohei (kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com) wrote:
>> Could you post any review comments, even if it is not comprehensive yet?
>
> In general, you don't need to preface your comments with 'MEMO:'.  I
> would encourage removing that.  You might use 'FIXME:' instead, if it is
> something which needs to be corrected in the future.  Additionally,
> please think about PG as a whole project.  Talking about 'native
> privilege mechanism' implies there are 'native' and 'foreign' ones.  I
> would recommend using the term 'default' instead.

Or maybe 'standard'?

...Robert

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-09-29 13:48:46 Re: Rejecting weak passwords
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-09-29 13:40:40 Re: [PATCH] DefaultACLs