Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: generic copy options

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Emmanuel Cecchet <manu(at)frogthinker(dot)org>, Emmanuel Cecchet <manu(at)asterdata(dot)com>, Emmanuel Cecchet <Emmanuel(dot)Cecchet(at)asterdata(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: generic copy options
Date: 2009-09-21 18:05:26
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I wrote:
>> As far as I can tell, the majority opinion is to use "format csv"
> BTW, if we're going to do that, shouldn't the "binary" option instead
> be spelled "format binary"?

Good catch, +1.


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2009-09-21 18:07:52
Subject: Re: Standalone backends run StartupXLOG in an incorrect environment
Previous:From: Emmanuel CecchetDate: 2009-09-21 18:04:32
Subject: Re: generic copy options

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group