| From: | Emmanuel Cecchet <manu(at)asterdata(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Emmanuel Cecchet <manu(at)frogthinker(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Emmanuel Cecchet <Emmanuel(dot)Cecchet(at)asterdata(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: generic copy options |
| Date: | 2009-09-21 18:04:32 |
| Message-ID: | 4AB7C030.2030904@asterdata.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
>
>> As far as I can tell, the majority opinion is to use "format csv"
>>
>
> BTW, if we're going to do that, shouldn't the "binary" option instead
> be spelled "format binary"?
>
Looking at the doc, it looks like FORMAT should be mandatory and be
either text, binary or csv (for now).
manu
--
Emmanuel Cecchet
Aster Data Systems
Web: http://www.asterdata.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-09-21 18:05:26 | Re: generic copy options |
| Previous Message | David E. Wheeler | 2009-09-21 17:52:43 | Re: updated hstore patch |